Narendra Modi explains the reason for dividing India into 3

You’re referencing a complex and highly debated chapter in Indian history involving the events of 1947-48, the partition, the accession of Jammu and Kashmir, and the subsequent political and military decisions made by leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, and the implications for modern India — including statements reportedly made by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Let’s unpack this clearly and factually:


🕰️ Background: Kashmir in 1947

After Partition, princely states were given the choice to join either India or Pakistan.

Maharaja Hari Singh, ruler of Jammu & Kashmir, initially chose to stay independent.

In October 1947, Pashtun tribal militias (often referred to as “Mujahideen” or “raiders”) from Pakistan invaded Kashmir.

The Maharaja sought help from India. India agreed, but only after he signed the Instrument of Accession to join the Indian Union.

Indian troops were airlifted to Kashmir, and the first Indo-Pak war began.


⚔️ Nehru vs. Patel: Was There a Disagreement?

Sardar Patel, as Home Minister, had successfully integrated many princely states.

Some historical sources suggest Patel was initially indifferent to Kashmir, viewing it as more within Nehru’s area due to Nehru’s Kashmiri roots.

Later, Patel may have favored a firmer military response and possibly opposed taking the Kashmir issue to the UN, which Nehru did in January 1948.

There is no public record of Patel suggesting a preemptive invasion of Kashmir before the tribal attack — that’s more of a post-facto political interpretation or hypothesis.


🧨 “75-year-old terror attack” and Modi’s Comments

You’re likely referring to a recent statement by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, possibly during a political speech in 2024 or 2025, where he criticized Nehru’s Kashmir policy and connected it to the long-standing issue of terrorism in the region.

> Modi may have argued that if Nehru had acted differently in 1947, India could have avoided:

The Kashmir conflict

Subsequent wars

Ongoing terrorism

Possibly, the necessity of recent changes like abrogation of Article 370



🧭 “Dividing India into 3”: What Modi Might Have Meant

If Modi said “dividing India into 3,” it could symbolically mean:

1. India

2. Pakistan

3. Kashmir — as a permanently disputed region, kept unresolved due to past decisions.


This statement isn’t about a literal three-way split, but about the long-term geopolitical consequences of leaving Kashmir unresolved, in Modi’s view.



🧩 Key Interpretations

Modi’s view reflects a nationalist, assertive stance on Kashmir and Pakistan.

Critics of Nehru often argue he made strategic errors — e.g., taking the matter to the UN or declaring a ceasefire too early.

Supporters of Nehru argue that his decisions avoided a full-scale war and maintained India’s democratic and moral standing.



🧠 Conclusion

This topic blends historical facts, political interpretations, and ideological perspectives. While Modi’s statements reflect a particular political narrative — often critical of Nehru — the full picture is more nuanced. Patel and Nehru had different priorities, but both were trying to hold together a fragile post-Partition India.

Would you like a timeline, comparison chart of Nehru vs Patel’s Kashmir views, or a breakdown of Modi’s recent speech?